New nitrile hydratase papers

Enzyme–Substrate Binding Landscapes in the Process of Nitrile Biodegradation Mediated by Nitrile Hydratase and Amidase from Yu Zhang, Zhuotong Zeng, Guangming Zeng, Xuanming Liu, Ming Chen, Lifeng Liu, Zhifeng Liu & Gengxin Xie in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology describes molecular modelling experiments using the crystal structures 2QDY (AJ270 Fe based NHase) and 1IRE (Pseudonocardia thermophila Co based NHase).This is a docking study for these two enzymes and a downstream amidase. Available at DOI 10.1007/s12010-013-0276-1. Shown below is Fig1b which illustrates a binding mode between the P. thermophila Co based NHase and 3-cyanopyridine.

Strategy for successful expression of the Pseudomonas putida nitrile hydratase activator P14K in Escherichia coli by Yi Liu, Wenjing Cui , Yueqin Fang, Yuechun Yu, Youtian Cui, Yuanyuan Xia, Michihiko Kobayashi and Zhemin Zhou adds to debate around the activator which is used for the maturation of the NHase with inclusion of the metal centre  (they say an activator is always needed, but is that true?). This paper is found in BMC Biotechnology at DOI:10.1186/1472-6750-13-48 and describes a methodology to ensure that the P14K activator is expressed successfully and in a more stable form.

Aligning cobalt centre NHases

I have been using the FATCAT protocol to look at structural alignments of differing cobalt centred NHases. This is available as a tool here.
Here is a picture of the alpha chains of 1V29 and 1 IRE aligned.

And here is a picture of the alignment of the beta chains. A bit more variation there.

More automated modelling

I had a go at trying to get SWISSmodel to produce a structure prediction for the 3D structure of the single subunit NHase of Monosiga brevicollis. It had a fair stab at it, as I would expect since there are existing PDB files of alpha and beta subunits which match the relevant portions of the chain, but still it isnt right. The placement of the metal ion is the immediate indicator for me that it has gone wrong- I would want the active site in the middle not on an exposed edge.



Considering the similarity of the sequence to the alpha subunit to that in the PDB file 1IRE (left below), and the beta subunit in PDB file 1V29 (middle below), I was expecting something a bit like those to thrown together, with some guess at the histidine-heavy chain linking the two ends (poking out to the right on my guesstimate shown below right).



How many clearly different structures of NHase are reported as pdb files?

Another helpful thing that the Iterative Magic Fit function within DeepView can do is provide a numerical value (based on a RMS calculation) for the similarity of the three dimensionality of the enzymes being overlaid. After concentrating on enzymes which are clearly NHases, discarding structures which are clearly mutants of an existing structure (which is either obvious from the title or the combination of author and date of submission), you get left with 13 distinct pdb files [1AHJ, 1IRE, 1UGP, 1V29, 2AHJ, 2CYZ, 2CZ6, 2D0Q, 2DPP, 2QDY, 2ZPB, 3A8O and 3HHT]. I then IMFed every one of these against each other to get a matrix of values for similarity. Basically if they had a value of less than 0.5, they look pretty much the same, greater than 1 than they look noticeably different.
The results of this showed that ALL the iron centred enzymes have RMS of <0.5 with each other which is not entirely surprising since they are all from Rhodococcus species. They all have RMS of greater than 1 for all the cobalt centred enzymes. There are two distinctly different cobalt centred arrangements: the Pseudonocardia thermophila pair of 1IRE and IUGP, and the trio of Bacillus structures of 1V29, 2DPP and 3HHT. Within these groupings they have RMS of less than 0.5, and between the groupings RMS of greater than 1.
Effectively this says to me that there are three basic structures for NHase known currently- one iron based and two cobalt based. Below is an excerpt from a table holding all the results from these calculations which shows this clustering.

PDB ID	1AHJ	1IRE
1AHJ		1.06
1IRE	1.06
1UGP	1.06	0.07
1V29	1.19	1.14
2AHJ	0.45	1.09
2CYZ	0.44	1.07
2CZ6	0.47	1.09
2D0Q	0.45	1.09
2DPP	1.22	1.16
2QDY	0.46	1.09
2ZPB	0.44	1.08
3A8O	0.47	1.11
3HHT	1.22	1.15